MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985401038

Sector: TCAM Space Aware Routing on SDN.

2016· article· en· W2985401038 on OpenAlexaff
Sai Qian Zhang, Qi Zhang, Ali Tizghadam, Byungchul Park, Hadi Bannazadeh, Raouf Boutaba, Alberto Leon‐Garcia

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Test Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkScalabilityRouting (electronic design automation)Distributed computingSoftware-defined networkingNetwork topologyContent-addressable memoryFlexibility (engineering)Network congestionScheme (mathematics)Operating systemArtificial neural network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Software Defined Networking (SDN), fine-grained control over individual flow can be achieved by installing appropriate forwarding rules in switches and routers. This allows the network to realize a wide variety of functionalities and objectives. But at the same time, this flexibility and versatility come at the expense of (1) a huge burden on the limited Ternary Content Addressable Memory (TCAM) space, and (2) limited scalability due to the large number of forwarding rules handled by the controller. To address these limitations, we present Sector, a switch memory-aware routing scheme that reduces TCAM space usage without introducing network congestion. We consider static and dynamic versions and propose corresponding solution algorithms. Experiments show our algorithms can reduce TCAM space usage and network control traffic by 20%-80% compared with the benchmark algorithms on different network topologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Test ConferenceSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207