Patch-Based and Tensor-Patch-Based Dimension Reduction Methods for Hyperspectral Images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The majority of current dimension reduction methods are restricted to the use of spectral information, when the spatial information is left out. In order to overcome this defect, two different solutions: patch-based and tensor-patch-based approaches, were studied in this paper. This paper applies the two solutions to a group of graph-based dimension reduction methods. We found that the patch-based and tensor-patch-based variations greatly boost the final classification results by 5%-15% from the traditional methods. As graph-based methods heavily rely on the calculation of adjacency graphs/weight matrices, this paper proposed the use of a new method: weighted region covariance matrix, to produce the adjacency graphs/weight matrices. In results, the newly proposed method can further improve the dimension reduction results in both the patch-based and tensor-patch-based methods. To reduce the intense computation in the adjacency graphs/weight matrix calculation, the principle component analysis (PCA) is proposed by this paper as a preprocess step.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it