MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985557721

Modeling and measuring insurance risks for a hierarchical copula model considering IFRS 17 framework

2019· dissertation· en· W2985557721 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Araiza Iturria, Carlos Andrés

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopula (linguistics)UnivariateEconometricsActuarial scienceLine of businessMultivariate statisticsBivariate analysisCapital requirementAutoregressive modelTail dependenceEconomicsBusiness modelComputer scienceBusinessMathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, a stochastic approach to insurance risk modeling and measurement that is compliant with the new International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS 17) is proposed. The compliance is achieved through the use of a semiparametric hierarchical copula which accounts for the dependence between the lines of business of the Canadian auto insurance industry. A model for the marginal unpaid claim liabilities of each line of business based on double generalized linear models is also developed. Development year and accident year effect factors along with an autoregressive feature for residuals enable modeling the dependence between the various entries of the loss triangles in a given line of business. Capital requirements calculations are then performed through simulation; numbers obtained with univariate and multivariate risk measures are compared. Moreover, a risk adjustment for non-financial risk required by IFRS 17 is also computed through a cost of capital approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.298
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207