MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985619122 · doi:10.4000/books.msha.4975

Méthodologie de la mesure de l’audience en radio : diversité des méthodes et divergences de résultats, le cas de la Belgique

2005· book-chapter· fr· W2985619122 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Antoine

Bibliographic record

VenueMaison des Sciences de l’Homme d’Aquitaine eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les faiblesses de la mesure d’audience radiophonique Dans le contexte des méthodologies mises en œuvre afin de mesurer, de manière la plus précise qu’il soit, la quantité et les spécificités socio-économiques des individus utilisateurs des médias audiovisuels, les résultats récoltés par les méthodes d’audimétrie télévisuelles ont, depuis une vingtaine d’années, affirmé une efficacité au moins quantitative. Même s’il ne manque pas de critiques qui puissent être adressées à l’audimétrie télévis...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.038
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaison des Sciences de l’Homme d’Aquitaine eBooksSame topicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital MediaFrench-language works237,207