A machine learning approach based on multifractal features for crack assessment of reinforced concrete shells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The geometric properties and spatial characteristics of crack patterns are significant indicators of the extent of damage on reinforced concrete structures. However, manual visual assessment is subjective and depends highly on the inspector's skills. The current study proposes an automated approach for the quantification of digitally documented crack patterns on reinforced concrete shell elements subjected to reversed cyclic shear loading. Multifractal analysis is proposed as a feature extractor for images depicting crack patterns and a set of artificial cracks is analyzed, to quantify how the properties of crack patterns vary as a function of cracking inclination. The results of the parametric study motivated the training of a multiclass classification model, which is used to provide damage level estimates for cracked reinforced concrete members. The training of the classifier is performed using experimental data of reinforced concrete shell elements under well-defined and idealized two-dimensional pure shear stress loading conditions. A dataset with 119 images from crack patterns of reinforced concrete shells is used for training. The multifractal features successfully translate the shape of the crack patterns into meaningful information about the extent of damage; achieving an overall test accuracy of 89.3%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".