Two-step potassium hydroxide etching to enhance aspect ratio in trench fabrication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among various grating structure fabrication techniques, potassium hydroxide (KOH) wet anisotropic etching of Si(110) wafers offers low cost and impressive aspect ratio over large areas with high etch uniformity. The aspect ratio is ultimately limited by lateral etching that constantly widens the trenches. In this paper, the authors demonstrated a method to double the achievable aspect ratio using two-step KOH etching. After first KOH etching, the grating structure was grown with a thermal oxide; and after removing the oxide from the trench bottom using reactive ion etching, a second KOH etching was carried out with the original trench sidewall protected by the thermal oxide. The authors achieved the highest anisotropy [etching rate ratio of (110) and (111)] of 247 with 50 wt. % KOH at room temperature. Using the two-step KOH etching, it is possible to increase the aspect ratio by more than a factor of 2 while keeping the trench width almost unchanged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".