MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985745316

Elizabeth Blight 1944–2019

2019· article· en· W2985745316 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diane Haglund

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlightArtHorticultureBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elizabeth Blight, who developed the still image, documentary art, and cartographic holdings of the Archives of Manitoba over a career that spanned 41 years, died of cancer on 11 April 2019 at St. Andrews, Manitoba.She was 75.Rarely referred to as "Elizabeth," she was known as Betts to family and as Betty to friends.She is remembered as being "the heart and soul of archives in Manitoba."Betty was born in Toronto, where her father was training bomber pilots during the Second World War.After the war, the family settled in Regina.She attended Herchmer and Benson schools and, from a young age, was involved in the arts, taking ballet lessons and following in her mother's footsteps as a meticulous craftswoman.Throughout her high school and university days, she directed plays and took a leadership role in campus activities.Betty received her undergraduate degree as part of the first class to graduate at the University of Regina campus where her father was Registrar.Following graduation, her sense of adventure took her to England, where she spent a year working for the Bank of Montreal in London and exploring all that the country had to offer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0790.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)Same topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207