Micro-solvation of CO in water: infrared spectra and structural calculations for (D<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>–CO and (D<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>–CO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The weakly-bound molecular clusters (D2O)2-CO and (D2O)3-CO are observed in the C-O stretch fundamental region (≈2150 cm-1), and their rotationally-resolved infrared spectra yield precise rotational parameters. The corresponding H2O clusters are also observed, but their bands are broadened by predissociation, preventing detailed analysis. The rotational parameters are insufficient in themselves to determine cluster structures, so ab initio calculations are employed, and good agreement between the experiment and theory is found for the most stable cluster isomers, yielding the basic cluster geometries as well as confirming the assignments to (D2O)2-CO and (D2O)3-CO. The trimer, (D2O)2-CO, has a near-planar geometry with one D atom from each D2O slightly out of the plane. The tetramer, (D2O)3-CO, has the water molecules arranged in a cyclic quasi-planar ring similar to the water trimer, with the carbon monoxide located 'above' the ring and roughly parallel to its plane. The tunneling effects observed in the free water dimer and trimer are quenched by the presence of CO. The previously observed water-CO dimer together with the trimer and tetramer reported here represent the first three steps in the solvation of carbon monoxide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".