MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985858918 · doi:10.1107/s205698901901497x

Crystal structure of 4-chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid with 4-hydroxyquinoline: a disordered structure over two states of 4-chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid–quinolin-4(1<i>H</i>)-one (1/1) and 4-hydroxyquinolinium 4-chloro-2-nitrobenzoate

2019· article· en· W2985858918 on OpenAlexaff
Kazuma Gotoh, Hiroyuki Ishida

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystal structures of chemical compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen bondTautomerChemistryCrystallographyBenzoic acidDeprotonationCrystal (programming language)Crystal structureNitroSalt (chemistry)MoleculeBioinformaticsStereochemistryPhysical chemistryIonOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title compound, C 9 H 7.5 NO·C 7 H 3.5 ClNO 4 , was analysed as a disordered structure over two states, viz . co-crystal and salt, accompanied by a keto–enol tautomerization in the base molecule. The co-crystal is 4-chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid–quinolin-4(1 H )-one (1/1), C 7 H 4 ClNO 4 ·C 9 H 7 NO, and the salt is 4-hydroxyquinolinium 4-chloro-2-nitrobenzoate, C 9 H 8 NO + ·C 7 H 3 ClNO 4 − . In the compound, the acid and base molecules are held together by a short hydrogen bond [O...O = 2.4393 (15) Å], in which the H atom is disordered over two positions with equal occupancies. In the crystal, the hydrogen-bonded acid–base units are linked by N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming a tape structure along the a- axis direction. The tapes are stacked into a layer parallel to the ab plane via π–π interactions [centroid–centroid distances = 3.5504 (8)–3.9010 (11) Å]. The layers are further linked by another C—H...O hydrogen bond, forming a three-dimensional network. Hirshfeld surfaces for the title compound mapped over shape-index and d norm were generated to visualize the intermolecular interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicCrystal structures of chemical compoundsFrench-language works237,207