MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2985888029 · doi:10.1121/1.5136609

Azimuthal, spatial, and temporal variability of acoustic intensity in along-the-shelf direction of Chukchi shelf from June to August 2017

2019· article· en· W2985888029 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Badiey, Lin Wan, Sean Pecknold, Altan Turgut

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAzimuthGeologyChannel (broadcasting)AcousticsSound (geography)Sound intensityIntensity (physics)Temperature salinity diagramsOceanographySalinityOpticsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial, temporal, and azimuthal variability of sound propagation with simultaneously measured oceanography on the Chukchi shelf is reported. Broadband acoustic signals (0.7 to 1.1 kHz) were transmitted from a single sound source placed near the sound channel axis in 150 m water depth and received by two arrays about 32 km away at different angles forming two acoustic tracks. One was along the 120–150 m isobath and the other crossing 120 to 220 m isobath. The angle between the two acoustic paths was 30 deg. Sound emitted from the common source shows different behavior along each acoustic track. Concurrently detailed water column environmental parameters (i.e., salinity and temperature) were measured in the region in both “along” and “cross-shelf” directions. Emergence of a warm water masses during from late June to July caused a variable channel where transmissions showed markedly large intensity variations (∼20 dB). This presentation quantifies data analysis using correlation between acoustics and environmental signals. [Work supported by ONR 322OA.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicUnderwater Acoustics Research→French-language works237,207→