Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le vieillissement de la population autochtone du Canada a mis en évidence l'importance du milieu de vie et de la culture sur la santé et la résilience dans le parcours de vie. La présente étude expose les résultats d'un projet Photovoix portant sur les expériences des Inuits du Sud lors de transitions associées au troisième âge et à la démence au NunatuKavut (Labrador). Dans cette région, la culture et l'environnement naturel occupent une place prépondérante dans les descriptions des activités de promotion de la santé et des trajectoires de soins. Ces facteurs peuvent contribuer au vieillissement en santé, offrir une protection contre le déclin cognitif et favoriser le maintien de l'identité des personnes atteintes de démence. Or, les modes de vie ancrés dans la terre ancestrale font l'objet de fortes pressions. Ces pressions affectent les perspectives des aînés Inuits du Sud de vieillir et d'être soignés « dans leur milieu ». Les résultats de cette recherche reflètent la nécessité d'élaborer des approches de soutien pour les aînés Inuits du Sud désirant vieillir dans leur milieu, en considérant les conceptions culturelles de la personne et les politiques et programmes qui promeuvent l'engagement envers la nature et la culture. As the Indigenous population in Canada ages, there is a need to recognize the role of place and culture in supporting health and resilience over the life course. This article draws on the findings of a Photovoice project about Southern Inuit experiences of transitions into aging and dementia in NunatuKavut, Labrador. Here, culture and the natural environment are prominent in descriptions of health promotion and care trajectories. These factors may contribute to healthy aging, protect against cognitive decline, and support the maintenance of identity for people living with dementia. However, significant pressures on ways of living embedded in the land are also evident. Such forces are impacting Southern Inuit older adults’ ability to age and be cared for “in place”. The findings of this research reflect a need to consider ways to support Southern Inuit older adults to age in place, which might include reflecting on culturally grounded understandings of personhood, and policy and programming which promote engagement with the nature and culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".