MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985986435 · doi:10.1063/1.5111747

Dynamics of a toroidal pure electron plasma using 3D PIC simulations

2019· article· en· W2985986435 on OpenAlexaff
S. Khamaru, M. Sengupta, R. Ganesh

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsToroidElectronPlasmaAtomic physicsElectron densityRotational symmetryComputational physicsMechanicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear dynamics of toroidally confined, initially cold, collisionless pure electron plasma has been numerically simulated in a tight aspect ratio, axisymmetric device, confined using a toroidal magnetic field, using a 3D3V particle-in-cell code PEC3PIC. A set of three numerical experiments are conducted by loading the toroidal electron cloud at varying radial distances from the central axis at the vertical midplane, and a comparative analysis of the progression of cloud dynamics and particle transport in the three experiments is carried out. In each experiment, the cloud is seen to initiate toroidal Diocotron oscillations with the following interesting features: (i) initial nonlinear reshaping and density peaking, (ii) elliptical orbital path in the poloidal cross section along with chirp or rotational frequency dynamics and the increase and decrease in the peak density of the filled electron cloud, (iii) cross-field transport and particle loss, and (iv) the measured wall probe signals showing close similarity to experimental signals. It is demonstrated that relatively better confinement of electrons in the toroidal configuration is achieved by loading the initial plasma at the vertical midplane, close to the inner wall of the chamber, supporting the mean-field theoretical predictions. For all cases, the density distribution profiles in the (r−θ) and (r − z) planes of the cylindrical coordinate system (r,θ,z) have consistent peaked density central profiles. The time dependency of the dominant frequencies of the dynamics, obtained from wall probe data using Hilbert–Huang transformation and windowed Fourier transformation, suggests toroidicity induced low poloidal number m (∼1−12) coupling and dynamical chirping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of PlasmasSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207