MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Short Linear Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides: Screening, Optimizing, and Prediction

2008· article· en· W29860408 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Hilpert, Christopher D. Fjell, Artem Cherkasov

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantitative structure–activity relationshipAntimicrobial peptidesAntimicrobialPeptideComputational biologyChemistryCombinatorial chemistryBiologyBiochemistryStereochemistryMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of pathogenic antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is worsening, demonstrating the urgent need for new therapeutics that are effective against multidrug-resistant bacteria. One potential class of substances is cationic antimicrobial peptides. More than 1000 natural occurring peptides have been described so far. These peptides are short (less than 50 amino acids long), cationic, amphiphilic, demonstrate different three-dimensional structures, and appear to have different modes of action. A new screening assay was developed to characterize and optimize short antimicrobial peptides. This assay is based on peptides synthesized on cellulose, combined with a bacterium, where a luminescence gene cassette was introduced. With help of this method tens of thousands of peptides can be screened per year. Information gained by this high-throughput screening can be used in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) analysis. QSAR analysis attempts to correlate chemical structure to measurement of biological activity using statistical methods. QSAR modeling of antimicrobial peptides to date has been based on predicting differences between peptides that are highly similar. The studies have largely addressed differences in lactoferricin and protegrin derivatives or similar de novo peptides. The mathematical models used to relate the QSAR descriptors to biological activity have been linear models such as principle component analysis or multivariate linear regression. However, with the development of high-throughput peptide synthesis and an antibacterial activity assay, the numbers of peptides and sequence diversity able to be studied have increased dramatically. Also, "inductive" QSAR descriptors have been recently developed to accurately distinguish active from inactive drug-like activity in small compounds. "Inductive" QSAR in combination with more complex mathematical modeling algorithms such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) may yield powerful new methods for in silico identification of novel antimicrobial peptides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicAntimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207