Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes (AML-MRC) Who Achieved Remission with CPX-351 Versus 7+3: Phase 3 Exploratory Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The WHO 2016 AML-MRC designation applies to AML patients (pts) with: (1) a history of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm, (2) a MDS-related cytogenetic abnormality, or (3) multilineage dysplasia in >50% of ≥2 cell lineages in the absence of NPM1 or biallelic CEBPA mutations. Pts with AML-MRC typically have a poor prognosis with a low complete remission (CR) rate and short overall survival (OS) after induction chemotherapy. CPX-351 (Vyxeos®; daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome for injection) is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine [C] and daunorubicin [D] at a synergistic ratio. A large randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study (NCT01696084) in older pts with newly diagnosed, high-risk/secondary AML found that treatment with CPX-351 significantly improved median OS (9.56 vs 5.95 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69; 1-sided P = 0.003) vs conventional 7+3, with a safety profile comparable to that of 7+3. Based on results of this study, CPX-351 was approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML or AML-MRC. An exploratory subgroup analysis of the phase 3 study was performed to compare outcomes in pts with AML-MRC who achieved CR or CR with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery (CRi). Methods: Pts aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk/secondary AML were randomized 1:1 to receive 1-2 induction cycles with CPX-351 (100 units/m2 [C 100 mg/m2 +D 44 mg/m2] as a 90-minute infusion on Days 1, 3, and 5 [2nd induction: Days 1 and 3]) or 7+3 (C 100 mg/m2/day continuously for 7 days [2nd induction: 5 days] + D 60 mg/m2 on Days 1-3 [2nd induction: Days 1-2]). Pts achieving CR or CRi could receive up to 2 consolidation cycles with CPX-351 (65 units/m2 [C 65 mg/m2 + D 29 mg/m2] on Days 1 and 3) or 5+2 (as for 2nd induction). Pts could receive hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) at the treating physician's discretion. This exploratory analysis compared outcomes for CPX-351 vs 7+3 in pts who met the WHO 2008 AML-MRC criteria and achieved CR+CRi. Results: Of 309 enrolled pts, 246 (80%) were diagnosed with AML-MRC (123 pts in each arm). Baseline characteristics of pts with AML-MRC who achieved CR+CRi were generally balanced between arms; 31% and 45% of pts in the CPX-351 and 7+3 arms had antecedent MDS with prior hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy, 24% and 18% had antecedent MDS without prior HMAs, 7% and 8% had antecedent chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and 39% and 30% had de novo AML with MDS karyotype. More pts with AML-MRC achieved CR+CRi with CPX-351 (59/123 [48%]) vs 7+3 (40/123 [33%]; odds ratio = 1.83 [95% CI: 1.09-3.09]). Median OS in pts with AML-MRC who achieved CR+CRi was longer with CPX-351 vs 7+3 (19.15 vs 11.58 months; HR = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.24-0.96]; Figure 1). The HCT rate in AML-MRC pts with CR+CRi was greater with CPX-351 vs 7+3 (54% vs 43%; relative risk = 1.18 [95% CI: 0.79-1.76]), and OS landmarked from the HCT date was longer with CPX-351 (not reached vs 14.09 months; HR = 0.61 [95% CI: 0.27-1.50]; Figure 2). Among pts with de novo AML with MDS karyotype, median OS was 25.43 vs 14.03 months and the HCT rates were 57% vs 50% with CPX-351 and 7+3, respectively, while in pts with antecedent MDS, median OS was 18.53 vs 10.87 months and the HCT rates were 53% vs 44% with CPX-351 and 7+3, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in pts with AML-MRC who achieved CR+CRi were febrile neutropenia (CPX-351: 78%; 7+3: 80%), constipation (58%; 55%), nausea (53%; 53%), peripheral edema (49%; 65%), fatigue (47%; 50%), and diarrhea (37%; 78%). A cardiac TEAE was experienced by 29 (49%) pts with CPX-351 and 20 (50%) pts with 7+3; the most common events were tachycardia (20%; 18%) and atrial fibrillation (7%; 18%). The most common serious TEAEs were febrile neutropenia (CPX-351: 10%; 7+3: 13%) and ejection fraction decreased (8%; 10%). One pt in each arm discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. There was no early mortality by Day 60 in either arm. CPX-351 was associated with a longer median time to recovery of neutrophils to ≥500/μL (35 vs 29 days) and platelets to ≥50,000/μL (37 vs 28 days) vs 7+3 in pts who received 1 induction cycle. Conclusions: CPX-351 improved median OS overall and OS landmarked from the date of HCT vs 7+3 chemotherapy in the subgroup of AML-MRC pts who achieved CR+CRi. The safety profile for CPX-351 in this subgroup was consistent with the overall study population and the known safety profile of 7+3. Disclosures Ryan: AbbVie: Equity Ownership; University of Rochester: Patents & Royalties. Ritchie:AStella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, NS Pharma, Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene, Novartis: Other: travel support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board, travel support; agios: Other: Advisory board; Tolero: Other: Advisory board; Genentech: Other: Advisory board; Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad, Celgene, Incyte, Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Strickland:Kite: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Stone:Novartis, Agios, Arog: Research Funding; Argenx, Celgene, Takeda Oncology: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board/Committee: ; AbbVie, Actinium, Agios, Argenx, Arog, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Biolinerx, Celgene, Cornerstone Biopharma, Fujifilm, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Ono, Orsenix, Otsuka, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sumitomo, Trovagene: Consultancy. Schiller:Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Other, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Sangamo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Wieduwilt:Amgen, Leadiant, Merck, Servier: Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ryan:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Faderl:Jazz Pharmaceutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cortes:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy; Sun Pharma: Research Funding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".