MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Estudo do crescimento e desenvolvimento craniofaciais em pacientes pediátricos transplantados de células-tronco hematopoiéticas

2019· dissertation· pt· W2986188659 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Viana Frascino

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicOral health in cancer treatment
Canadian institutionsFraser Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

imenso carinho.Agradecimentos Aos orientadores, Prof. Dr. Vicente Odone Filho e Prof. Dr. Marcelo Fava pela competência e estímulo à carreira acadêmica e profissional.Ao amigo e colega Dr. Fábio Coracin pelo seu altruísmo e longa amizade.À Dra.Louise Cominato pelos valiosos aconselhamentos profissionais e pela sua inestimável amizade e confiança, cultivados desde o mestrado.A toda equipe de Odontólogos e funcionários do ITACI, e da Odontologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, pelas suas valiosas colaborações neste e em outros estudos.A cada um dos médicos, enfermeiros, profissionais de saúde, auxiliares e funcionários do Instituto da Criança e do Istituto do Tratamento do Câncer Infantil pelos ensinamentos e oportunidades de convívio.Às crianças do ITACI, que por meio de suas dores físicas e emocionais, me permitiram aprender diariamente sobre a resiliência e o valor da vida.A cada um dos membros da Viana Frascino Odontologia, em especial Sra.Eidi Rucci, pela amizade e apoio em todas as etapas da minha carreira acadêmica.A cada um daqueles que, um dia foram, ou ainda serãos, meus alunos; por confiarem a responsabilidade de lhes conduzirem em alguns passos de suas carreiras profissionais.Epígrafe "It is a long way to the top, if you wanna Rock'n Roll" AC/DC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOral health in cancer treatmentFrench-language works237,207