MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2986206681

Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotope geochemistry of the Laberge Group: synorogenic siliciclastic record of early Mesozoic crustal thickening and tectonic evolution of the Whitehorse trough in the northern Canadian Cordillera

2019· dissertation· en· W2986206681 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leigh Van Drecht

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyZirconGeochronologyTerraneTrough (economics)ProvenanceBasementPaleontologyMesozoicRiftGeochemistryStructural basinTectonicsArchaeologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Laberge Group consists of synorogenic, marginal-marine to deep-marine strata that were deposited in the Whitehorse trough of central Yukon during the collision of the northern Intermontane terranes along the western Laurentian margin. New detrital zircon U-Pb-Hf data from Laberge Group rock units constrain the Early to Middle Jurassic depositional ages and provenance of Whitehorse trough strata and determine their relationship to the unroofing history of adjacent basement successions. The Whitehorse trough initiated in the Sinemurian as a long, narrow basin that subsequently grew to the west, east, and south by Aalenian time and was sourced by Paleozoic Yukon- Tanana and Stikinia basement rocks and their synorogenic Late Triassic-Early Jurassic plutonic suites. Late Triassic-Middle Jurassic detrital zircon grains from the northern apex of the Whitehorse trough record an excursion to subchondritic Hf(t) values that coincides with the burial of Intermontane terranes and may record crustal thickening proximal to northern regions of the basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→