Using TDA underneath shallow foundations: simplified design procedure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tire recycling and reuse in North America and worldwide have increased considerably, with the aim of reducing the harmful effects of scrap tires on the environment. Accordingly, the use of tire derived aggregates (TDA) in civil engineering applications is on the rise at an unprecedented rate. In comparison to conventional backfill aggregates, TDA is an inexpensive, lightweight material that costs about 25% of the cost of conventional backfill. Thus, there is an increasing trend of using TDA under shallow foundations as a lightweight backfill alternative. However, limited information exists for the design of shallow foundations built on TDA. Hence, the main objective of this paper is to develop a simplified design procedure for shallow foundations built over a TDA layer. Rigorous finite element models were developed and validated using field tests results. Subsequently regression analyses were used to develop the proposed ultimate bearing capacity equation, taking into account the granular layer thickness, TDA layer thickness, footing width, footing shape, footing depth, and the allowable settlement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it