Imaging Soft-tissue Sarcomas of the Head and Neck: A Tertiary Soft-tissue Sarcoma Unit Experience
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: To describe imaging features of head and neck soft-tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of head and neck sarcoma between 2011 and 2015 were reviewed. RESULTS: There were a total of 62 patients (24 female; median age=60 years). Most common sarcomas were angiosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and sarcoma not otherwise specified. They were most commonly located in cranial and neck superficial soft tissues. Average tumour size at presentation was 45 mm. One patient had metastasis at presentation (rhabdomyosarcoma); two had nodal disease (rhabdomyosarcoma and angiosarcoma) and two tumours contained calcification (chondrosarcoma and synovial sarcoma). Four arose after prior radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Unlike the more common diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, the majority of head and neck sarcomas present as large, solitary, superficial masses without lymph node enlargement. Identification of these features on imaging should raise suspicion of a sarcoma diagnosis, particularly in the setting of previous irradiation or genetic susceptibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it