MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986267309 · doi:10.11622/smedj.2019144

School-based programme to address childhood myopia in Singapore

2019· article· en· W2986267309 on OpenAlexaff
Vijaya Karuppiah, Lee-Yang Wong, Veronica Tay, XJ Ge, Lili Kang

Bibliographic record

VenueSingapore Medical Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission
FundersNational University of Singapore
KeywordsMedicineOptometryVisual acuityChildhood blindnessPopulationVisual impairmentRefractive errorDemographyPediatricsOphthalmologyEnvironmental healthPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2050, a total of 4,758 million people worldwide (49.8% of the world’s population) are expected to be myopic, and 938 million people (9.8%) are expected to suffer from high myopia (myopia worse than −5.00 D).(1) Myopia, commonly known as short-sightedness or near-sightedness, has remained one of the biggest public health challenges in Singapore, which has very high myopia rates. Myopia typically begins in early childhood and progresses during childhood. Based on unpublished data from routine vision screening done by the School Health Service (SHS) using the Snellen chart, the prevalence of defective vision amounting to unaided visual acuity of 6/12 or worse among Primary 1 students was 33% in the year 2000, prior to the inception of the National Myopia Prevention Programme (NMPP). 65% of Singapore students suffered from myopia by the age of 12 years. Among these 12-year-old students, the prevalence of severe defective vision (i.e. unaided visual acuity worse than 6/60) was 13% (unpublished data). Age of onset of myopia and duration of myopia progression are the most important predictors of high myopia in later childhood.(2) Children with high myopia in the range of ≤ −5.0 D to −10.0 D(3) have higher risks of complications, such as myopic macular degeneration,(4-6) retinal detachment,(7) glaucoma(8) and blindness.(9) There was concern that if such trends continued, more than 80% of the population would be suffering from myopia by adulthood, and among them, a high proportion would have high myopia.(10-13) Given that Singapore has an ageing population, this would increase the burden on the healthcare system because of the greater need to provide treatment for myopia-related complications. As about 80% of male enlistees are myopic at the time of enlistment for National Service in Singapore, adjustments have to be made to accommodate the occupational demands of military duties, incurring additional costs.(11,14) The pool of candidates for National Service duties and military occupations that require good vision, such as pilots, would also be more limited.(11,14)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSingapore Medical JournalSame topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesFrench-language works237,207