MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986389474 · doi:10.4000/books.msha.2535

Grandeur et misère de la notion d’espace public

2010· book-chapter· fr· W2986389474 on OpenAlexaff
Annick Germain

Bibliographic record

VenueMaison des Sciences de l’Homme d’Aquitaine eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsESPACEPublic spaceHumanitiesArtEngineeringArchitectural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’espace public a été, tout au long de l’histoire des villes et de l’aménagement urbain, à la fois objet de toutes les attentions et de toutes les incompréhensions, dont des abus de langage. Ce constat en forme de paradoxe n’est probablement pas propre aux études urbaines, mais il prend ici des formes extrêmes qui ont sans doute à voir avec sa double réalité d’objet abstrait et d’objet concret. Comment établir un peu d’ordre dans les catégories d’espaces publics ? Tel est le propos des ligne...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.037
Scholarly communication0.0170.023
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaison des Sciences de l’Homme d’Aquitaine eBooksSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207