Technical and Economic Analysis on Masonry Materials of Exterior Walls for Building Energy Conservation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, resource saving and energy conservation have attracted a growing attention across the globe, calling for technical and economic analysis of energy efficiency of exterior walls in buildings. Targeting an actual building project, this paper introduces the energyefficient design software PKPM and the cost analysis software GBQ to the technical and economic analysis of the energy efficiency of exterior walls respectively made of three masonry materials: sintered porous bricks (SPBs), autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) blocks and ceramsite aerated concrete (CAC) blocks. The analysis shows that the exterior walls made of the CAC blocks achieved the energy conservation requirements with the simplest structure, easiest construction and lowest cost. The application of the CAC blocks in exterior walls can save resources and reduce building energy consumption, achieve excellent technical, economic and social benefits, and should be promoted in building projects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it