Rapid lipidomics analysis for sepsis-induced liver injury in rats and insights into lipid metabolic pathways using ultra-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lipidomics has been applied in the identification and quantification of molecular lipids within an organism, and to provide insights into mechanisms in clinical medicine. Sepsis is a major systemic inflammatory syndrome and the liver here is a potential target organ for dysfunctional response. However, the study of alterations in global lipid profiles associated with sepsis-induced liver injury is still limited. In this work, we set out to determine alterations of lipidomics profiles in a rat model of sepsis-induced liver injury using an untargeted lipidomics strategy. Liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry in conjunction with multivariate data analysis and pathway analysis were used to acquire a global lipid metabolite profile. Meanwhile, biochemistry index and histopathological examinations of the liver were performed to obtain auxiliary measurements for determining the pathological changes associated with sepsis-induced liver injury. Eleven lipid metabolites and two metabolic pathways were discovered and associated with sepsis-induced liver injury. The results indicated that various biomarkers and pathways may provide evidence for and insight into lipid profile alterations associated with sepsis-induced liver injury, and hence pointed to potential strategic targets for clinical diagnosis and therapy in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".