MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986535009 · doi:10.1111/ene.14127

Cholinergic denervation in patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder

2019· article· en· W2986535009 on OpenAlex
Morten Gersel Stokholm, A. Iranzo, Karen Østergaard, Mónica Serradell, Marit Otto, Kristina Bacher Svendsen, Alícia Garrido, Dolores Vilas, Tatyana D. Fedorova, Joan Santamaría, Arne Møller, Carles Gaig, Kotaro Hiraoka, David J. Brooks, Nobuyuki Okamura, Per Borghammer, E. Tolosa, Nicola Pavese

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neurology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos IIISundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
KeywordsMedicineDenervationCholinergicRapid eye movement sleepEye movementNeurosciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationSleep (system call)REM sleep behavior disorderAnesthesiaAudiologyOphthalmologyPolysomnographyPsychiatryInternal medicineElectroencephalographyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and purpose Cholinergic dysfunction appears to play a role in the cognitive impairment observed in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. The occurrence of cholinergic dysfunction in the early stages of these conditions, however, has not been investigated. The objective of this study was to investigate cholinergic function in patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder (iRBD), a disorder recognized to be an early stage of both Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Methods A total of 21 patients with polysomnography‐confirmed iRBD with no evidence of parkinsonism and cognitive impairment and 10 controls underwent positron emission tomography (PET) to assess brain acetylcholinesterase levels ( 11 C‐donepezil PET) and nigrostriatal dopaminergic function ( 18 F‐DOPA PET). Clinical examination included the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III, Mini Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Results The 11 C‐donepezil PET was successfully performed in 17 patients with iRBD and nine controls. Compared with controls, patients with iRBD showed a mean 7.65% reduction in neocortical 11 C‐donepezil levels ( P = 0.005). Bilateral superior temporal cortex, occipital cortex, cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex showed the most significant reductions at voxel level. Conclusion Reduced neocortical 11 C‐donepezil binding in our patients indicates cholinergic denervation and suggests that the projections from the nucleus basalis of Meynert, which supplies cholinergic innervation to the neocortex, are dysfunctional in iRBD. Longitudinal studies will clarify if these changes are predictive of future cognitive impairment in these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it