MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986573554 · doi:10.3390/make1040061

Multi-Label Classification with Optimal Thresholding for Multi-Composition Spectroscopic Analysis

2019· article· en· W2986573554 on OpenAlexafffund
Luyun Gan, Brosnan Yuen, Tao Lű

Bibliographic record

VenueMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDefense Threat Reduction AgencyNvidia
KeywordsThresholdingPattern recognition (psychology)Linear discriminant analysisBinary numberArtificial intelligencePartial least squares regressionSample (material)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceNoise (video)Relevance (law)MathematicsMachine learningChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we implement multi-label neural networks with optimal thresholding to identify gas species among a multiple gas mixture in a cluttered environment. Using infrared absorption spectroscopy and tested on synthesized spectral datasets, our approach outperforms conventional binary relevance-partial least squares discriminant analysis when the signal-to-noise ratio and training sample size are sufficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMachine Learning and Knowledge ExtractionSame topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207