MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Broadband Circularly Polarized Antenna Based on Integrated Substrate Gap Waveguide

2021· article· en· W2986609696 on OpenAlexaff
Yongjie Li, Dongya Shen, Xiupu Zhang, Liping Zhou, Dandan You

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOpticsTurnstile antennaCircular polarizationReturn lossAxial ratioPhysicsBroadbandSlot antennaCoaxial antennaBandwidth (computing)Microstrip antennaRadiation patternAntenna efficiencyPatch antennaExtremely high frequencyOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceAntenna (radio)MicrostripTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new broadband circularly polarized (CP) antenna for 5G millimeter waves based on the integrated substrate gap waveguide (ISGW). The broadband circularly polarized antenna etches a rectangular slot on the PEC on the upper surface of the ISGW, and then adds two rectangular perturbation patches of different shapes on the rectangular slot, thereby realizing circularly polarized wave radiation. To expand the 10dB return loss bandwidth and axial ratio bandwidth of the slot circular polarization antenna based on the substrate integrated gap waveguide, a new dielectric plate is added above the ISGW, and a cross-shaped patch is added above the dielectric plate. This cross-shaped patch not only functions as a parasitic patch but also circularly polarized radiation, thereby achieving the purpose of expanding the 10dB return loss bandwidth and axial ratio bandwidth of the circularly polarized antenna.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207