MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986867926 · doi:10.1162/thld_a_00342

Ancient Hardware: France Coming to Terms with the Discovery of Pompeii and Herculaneum

2003· article· en· W2986867926 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brigitte Desrochers

Bibliographic record

VenueThresholds · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconArchitectureCitationThe artsMicroformLibrary scienceVisual artsDownloadHistoryArt historyArtComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

October 01 2019 Ancient Hardware: France Coming to Terms with the Discovery of Pompeii and Herculaneum Brigitte Desrochers Brigitte Desrochers Brigitte Desrochers has studied the representations of Pompeii as a scholar at the British School at Rome, the National Gallery of Canada, and the Canadian Center for Architecture. A Harvard graduate, she is in charge of architecture at the Canada Council for the Arts, and is Commissioner of the Canadian Pavillion at the Venice Biennale. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Brigitte Desrochers Brigitte Desrochers has studied the representations of Pompeii as a scholar at the British School at Rome, the National Gallery of Canada, and the Canadian Center for Architecture. A Harvard graduate, she is in charge of architecture at the Canada Council for the Arts, and is Commissioner of the Canadian Pavillion at the Venice Biennale. Online Issn: 2572-7338 Print Issn: 1091-711X © 2003 Brigitte Desrochers2003Brigitte Desrochers Thresholds (2003) (27): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1162/thld_a_00342 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Brigitte Desrochers; Ancient Hardware: France Coming to Terms with the Discovery of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Thresholds 2003; (27): 49–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/thld_a_00342 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsThresholds Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2003 Brigitte Desrochers2003Brigitte Desrochers Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThresholdsSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207