MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FRONTEIRA: LIMITES SEM LIMITES

2017· article· pt· W2986869708 on OpenAlexaff
Andre Pessoa Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudos Geográficos Revista Eletrônica de Geografia · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Racism, and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo tem como norte a fronteira e como são os desdobramentos da mesma no debate geográfico. A partir de levantamentos bibliográficos, objetiva-se estabelecer reflexões que permitam construir e aglutinar à Geografia noções sólidas sobre a fronteira, (in) diretamente presente na sociedade brasileira. Parte-se do pressuposto de que a fronteira – que, por sua vez, é um limite político-administrativo – não possui limites, visto suas inúmeras representações e desdobramentos. Por possuir singularidades, pode ser interpretada sob diversas escalas, sendo elas geográficas, sociais e econômicas, o que reforça o fato de que não há limites para a fronteira.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0110.026
Scholarly communication0.0180.016
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudos Geográficos Revista Eletrônica de GeografiaSame topicMigration, Racism, and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207