MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986918529 · doi:10.1145/3360322.3360995

BESOS

2019· article· en· W2986918529 on OpenAlex
Gaëlle Faure, T.V. Christiaanse, Ralph Evins, Gaby Baasch

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersCanarie
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingSoftwareTask (project management)Software engineeringSystems engineeringEnergy (signal processing)Human–computer interactionOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerous software modelling tools and design techniques exist to answer questions related to optimal or exploration of building and energy system design. Current research requires that these tools and techniques are combined, leading to the energy- and time-consuming task of linking them. Our demo presents BESOS, a platform designed to facilitate the interaction of several commonly-used tools to analyze and design building and energy systems. This platform is cloud-based and open-source, making it widely available for the research community. Attendees will be able to run and modify two test example applications during the demo, the first one focusing on constructing a surrogate model that predicts building energy demand, the second, optimally designing an energy system for a remote community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.001
GPT teacher head0.128
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntegrated Energy Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207