MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987019239 · doi:10.3917/comla1.201.0041

Des concepts au terrain : questionnements relatifs à la culture numérique en éducation aux médias et par les médias

2019· article· fr· W2987019239 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication & langages · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Croisant les recherches doctorales de ses trois auteures, cet article explore comment, dans la recherche en éducation aux médias et en éducation par les médias, le rapport des acteurs étudiés aux médias et au numérique est théorisé au départ de différents concepts : culture numérique, pratiques numériques, représentations sociales du numérique, et apprentissage. L’article met ensuite au jour la diversité des façons d’opérationnaliser ces concepts dans des méthodes adaptées aux objets des deux champs de recherche. Face à ces positionnements théoriques et méthodologiques, l’article met en exergue la nécessité pour les chercheurs d’interroger leur rapport aux acteurs étudiés, le rapport du discours qu’ils produisent à celui énoncé par ces acteurs, et l’utilité attendue de leurs recherches pour le champ qu’ils étudient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.278
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it