MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987045190 · doi:10.1049/iet-pel.2019.0193

Reduced switching state multilevel improved power factor converter for level‐3 electric vehicle applications

2019· article· en· W2987045190 on OpenAlexaff
Naveen Yalla, Pramod Agarwal, A. V. J. S. Praneeth, Vinod Kumar Bussa

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Power Electronics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopology (electrical circuits)Fault (geology)Electric vehicleTransient (computer programming)Power (physics)Power factorVoltageEngineeringControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, an off‐board multi‐terminal dc charger with active input current shaping for level‐3 electric vehicle (EV) charging applications is proposed. The configuration is based on reduced switching state multi‐point clamped, three phase improved power factor converter and supplied by the standard ac grid. The topology has the advantage of reduced device count along with reduced maximum device stress. This will increase the speed of EV charging and enables the reduction of capital and maintenance costs of the charging facilities, enhancing further expansion of the eco‐friendly transport. In addition, one of the key performance indicator, i.e. the fault ride‐through capability, is investigated in the proposed topology under various unbalanced input conditions. Further, steady‐state and transient performance of topology during load, as well as, dc‐link voltage change is presented. Minimum distorted and balanced line currents are drawn from supply by implementing negative sequence elimination control algorithm. The validation of the proposed topology is verified with simulation and a down‐scaled experimental setup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207