Unsupervised domain adaptation for the automated segmentation of neuroanatomy in MRI: a deep learning approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Neuroanatomical segmentation in T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain is a prerequisite for quantitative morphological measurements, as well as an essential element in general pre-processing pipelines. While recent fully automated segmentation methods based on convolutional neural networks have shown great potential, these methods nonetheless suffer from severe performance degradation when there are mismatches between training (source) and testing (target) domains (e.g. due to different scanner acquisition protocols or due to anatomical differences in the respective populations under study). This work introduces a new method for unsupervised domain adaptation which improves performance in challenging cross-domain applications without requiring any additional annotations on the target domain. Using a previously validated state-of-the-art segmentation method based on a context-augmented convolutional neural network, we first demonstrate that networks with better domain generalizability can be trained using extensive data augmentation with label-preserving transformations which mimic differences between domains. Second, we incorporate unlabelled target domain samples into training using a self-ensembling approach, demonstrating further performance gains, and further diminishing the performance gap in comparison to fully-supervised training on the target domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".