MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987205493 · doi:10.1109/twc.2019.2952349

Outage Performance and Average Rate for Large-Scale Millimeter-Wave NOMA Networks

2019· article· en· W2987205493 on OpenAlexafffund
Sachitha Kusaladharma, Wei‐Ping Zhu, Wessam Ajib

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTelecommunications linkBase stationStochastic geometryComputer scienceNomaCoverage probabilityComputer networkCellular networkFadingTransmitter power outputChannel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsTransmitterMathematicsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and millimeter wave communications are key technologies for the fifth-generation of cellular networks and beyond, and the coexistence of these two techniques is critical. This paper characterizes the system performance through the outage probability and achievable downlink rate for large-scale millimeter wave NOMA networks by using stochastic geometry. In order to reflect spatial randomness, we consider homogeneous Poisson point processes to model the base stations and user equipments. Moreover, blockages which affect the channel characteristics, power allocation based on the combined channel gain, and imperfections in the successive interference cancellation are considered. The aggregate co-channel interference at a user is characterized based on the moment generating function. Finally, the outage probability and downlink rate are derived for a two-user NOMA scenario under two user-base station association schemes: 1) closest base station association and 2) closest line-of-sight base station association. It is seen that using NOMA under millimeter wave channels increases the achievable downlink rate while keeping the performance impact on individual users low, and that the closest line-of-sight base station association scheme is comparatively advantageous. Moreover, a dense base station deployment generally improves the performance further.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207