MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987236066 · doi:10.1101/844324

Surface Sensing Stimulates Cellular Differentiation in <i>Caulobacter crescentus</i>

2019· preprint· en· W2987236066 on OpenAlexaff
Rhett A. Snyder, Courtney K. Ellison, Geoffrey B. Severin, Christopher M. Waters, Yves V. Brun

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaulobacter crescentusCell biologyPilusBiologyCell cycleCellular differentiationCellCell adhesionGeneticsEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cellular differentiation is a fundamental strategy used by cells to generate specialized functions at specific stages of development. The bacterium C. crescentus employs a specialized dimorphic life cycle consisting of two differentiated cell types. How environmental cues, including mechanical inputs such as contact with a surface, regulate this cell cycle remain unclear. Here, we find that surface sensing by the physical perturbation of retracting extracellular pilus filaments accelerates cell cycle progression and cellular differentiation. We show that physical obstruction of dynamic pilus activity by chemical perturbation or by a mutation in the outer membrane pilus pore protein, CpaC, stimulates early initiation of chromosome replication. In addition, we find that surface contact stimulates cell cycle progression by demonstrating that surface-stimulated cells initiate early chromosome replication to the same extent as planktonic cells with obstructed pilus activity. Finally, we show that obstruction of pilus retraction stimulates the synthesis of the cell cycle regulator, cyclic diguanylate monophosphate (c-di-GMP) through changes in the activity and localization of two key regulatory histidine kinases that control cell fate and differentiation. Together, these results demonstrate that surface contact and mechanosensing by alterations in pilus activity stimulate C. crescentus to bypass its developmentally programmed temporal delay in cell differentiation to more quickly adapt to a surface-associated lifestyle. Significance Cells from all domains of life sense and respond to mechanical cues [1–3]. In eukaryotes, mechanical signals such as adhesion and surface stiffness are important for regulating fundamental processes including cell differentiation during embryonic development [4]. While mechanobiology is abundantly studied in eukaryotes, the role of mechanical influences on prokaryotic biology remains under-investigated. Here, we demonstrate that mechanosensing mediated through obstruction of the dynamic extension and retraction of t ight ad herence (tad) pili stimulates cell differentiation and cell cycle progression in the dimorphic α-proteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus . Our results demonstrate an important intersection between mechanical stimuli and the regulation of a fundamental aspect of cell biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207