Effects of defects in hybrid sheet moulding compound – Evaluation of defects and the impact on mechanical properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sheet moulding compound is a widely used fibre‐reinforced material. Generally, it consists of discontinuous glass fibres in a thermoset matrix system. Due to the finite fibre length, mechanical properties of structural components are limited. To overcome this drawback, sheet moulding compound is locally reinforced with a unidirectional carbon fibre sheet moulding compound material in the approach presented in this contribution. The manufacturing of this hybrid material consisting of discontinuous glass fibre sheet moulding compound and continuous carbon fibre sheet moulding compound can result in different defects, such as folds or fibre misalignments. These defects may affect mechanical properties of the hybrid material. Consequently, this article deals with the investigation and analysis of defective hybrid sheet moulding compound components, which were examined by means of tensile tests. Results point out that investigated defects have different effects on mechanical properties. However, independent from the type of defect, mechanical properties were reduced. With a reduction of 68.86 %, folds have one of the greatest influences on tensile strength. In addition, depending on the angle deviation, even greater reductions can occur. Furthermore, the reduction of the mechanical properties can be identified clearly with increasing angle deviation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".