High-Throughput Synthesis, Analysis, and Optimization of Injectable Hydrogels for Protein Delivery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of in situ-gelling hydrogels that can enable prolonged protein release is increasingly important due to the emergence of a growing number of protein-based therapeutics. Herein, we describe a high-throughput strategy to fabricate, characterize, and subsequently optimize hydrazone-cross-linked in situ-gelling hydrogels for protein delivery. Hydrogels are fabricated using an automated high-throughput robot to mix a variety of thermoresponsive, nonthermoresponsive, charged, neutral, naturally sourced, and synthetic polymers functionalized with hydrazide or aldehyde groups, generating in situ-gelling hydrogels with well-defined compositions within a 96-well plate. High-throughput characterization strategies are subsequently developed to enable on-plate analysis of hydrogel swelling, mechanics, degradation, transparency, and protein (ovalbumin) release kinetics that yield results consistent with those collected using traditional bulk hydrogel analysis techniques. Dynamic regression and latent variable modeling are then applied to fit performance statistics to the collected data set; subsequently, numerical optimization is used to identify mixtures of precursor polymers that exhibit targeted combinations of minimal burst release, maximum total protein release, minimum release rate, and maximum transparency (the latter of particular relevance for ophthalmic protein delivery applications). Given the rapid throughput of the protocols developed (i.e., 126 hydrogels can be synthesized and screened in quadruplicate within hours), this approach offers particular promise for accelerating the identification of injectable hydrogel compositions relevant for both protein delivery as well as other biomedical applications for which clearly predefined materials properties are required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".