MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Utility of a Fully-distributed Direct Current Resistivity and Induced Polarisation System with Common Voltage Referencing

2019· article· en· W2987793726 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Rudd, Glenn Chubak

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsStornoway Diamond (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAzimuthData extractionUpgradeData qualityGroundVolume (thermodynamics)Real-time computingElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryThe direct current electrical resistivity and induced polarization (DCIP) method has received another significant upgrade through the introduction of common voltage referencing (CVR) in a fully-distributed array system. An array of single-channel receivers with a CVR wire allows for the extraction of an unprecedented volume of dipole data for the number of receivers deployed. In 3D implementation, this new method reduces noise levels and allows for the derivation of multi-scale and multi-azimuth receiver dipoles.Operational efficiencies in the CVR method include lower overall wire lengths, less equipment weight and less crew fatigue when compared with conventional and other distributed array methods. Cable-free mesh network capability in each receiver allows for real-time assessment of data quality metrics, safety information, location data, and system health data. These operational efficiencies translate directly to improvements in safety.With several hundred active receivers, data volume can reach 10s of millions of data records. Careful processing and selection of an optimised data subset with multi-scale and multi-azimuth information will inform highly accurate inversion imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207