MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987879255 · doi:10.1177/1475921719886067

Railway bearing and cardan shaft fault diagnosis via an improved morphological filter

2019· article· en· W2987879255 on OpenAlexafffund
Yifan Li, Ming J. Zuo, Zaigang Chen, Jianhui Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Health Monitoring · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesSichuan Province Science and Technology Support ProgramChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFilter (signal processing)VibrationAxleFault (geology)Noise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Sensitivity (control systems)Bearing (navigation)Convolution (computer science)Computer scienceEngineeringAcousticsStructural engineeringArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringComputer visionGeologyImage (mathematics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Railway faults are usually observed as impulses in the vibration signal, but they are mostly immersed in noise. To effectively remove noise and identify the impulses, an improved morphological filter is proposed in this article. The proposal focuses on two aspects: a novel gradient convolution operator is proposed for feature extraction, and a new fault sensitivity measurement algorithm is proposed for scale selection because a morphological filter’s effectiveness is mainly determined by these two elements. The performance of the improved morphological filter is evaluated with real vibration signals measured from train’s axle bearings and cardan shafts. From the analysis of three sets of railway faults, the results indicate that the proposed morphological filter effectively detects the faults. Compared with three reported morphological filters, the proposed method has better diagnosis effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructural Health MonitoringSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207