MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987905983 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.055202

Measurement of neutral pion photoproduction off the proton with the large acceptance electromagnetic calorimeter BGOegg

2019· article· en· W2987905983 on OpenAlexaff
N. Muramatsu, J. K. Ahn, W. C. Chang, J. Y. Chen, M. L. Chu, S. Daté, T. Gogami, H. Goto, H Hamano, Toshikazu Hashimoto, Q. He, K. Hicks, T. Hiraiwa, Y. Honda, T. Hotta, H. Ikuno, Yoshiyuki Inoue, T. Ishikawa, I. Jaeglé, J. M. Jo, Y. Kasamatsu, H. Katsuragawa, S. Kido, Y. Kon, S. Masumoto, Yoko Matsumura, M. Miyabe, K. Mizutani, T. Nakamura, Takayoshi Nakano, T. Nam, T. N. T. Ngan, M. Niiyama, Y. Nozawa, Yoji Ohashi, H. Ohnìshì, T. Ohta, K. Ozawa, C. Rangacharyulu, S. Y. Ryu, Y. Sada, M. Sasagawa, T. Shibukawa, H. Shimizu, R. Shirai, Kazunori Shiraishi, E. A. Strokovsky, Y. Sugaya, M. Sumihama, S. Suzuki, S. Tanaka, A. O. Tokiyasu, N. Tomida, Y. Tsuchikawa, Takashi Ueda, H. Yamazaki, Ryuichi Yamazaki, Y. Yanai, T. Yorita, C. Yoshida, M. Yosoi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsPhysicsPionNuclear physicsProtonMultipole expansionBeam (structure)Particle physicsPartial wave analysisPhotonAsymmetryRange (aeronautics)Atomic physicsPhoton energyEnergy (signal processing)PolarOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differential cross sections and photon beam asymmetries for the reaction $\ensuremath{\gamma}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}p$ have been measured in the photon beam energy range of $1.3--2.4\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{GeV}$ and the ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ polar angle range of $\ensuremath{-}1<cos{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}}^{\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{m}.}<0.7$. The measurement has been done by using a large acceptance electromagnetic calorimeter in the SPring-8 LEPS2/BGOegg experiment. The results of the photon beam asymmetry in a wide ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ polar angle range are new for the photon beam energies exceeding $1.9\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{GeV}$. None of the existing partial wave analysis models describe the observed asymmetries in the high energy region. The contribution of multipole amplitudes with an orbital angular momentum of 5 in the $\ensuremath{\pi}N$ system has been found to be important at these energies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207