Antara Validitas dan Inspirasionalitas: Wacana Historis Diaspora Minang di Bali
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes the historical discourse of Minang diaspora in Bali particularly the discourse that inspired them come to Bali, the history of their arrival, the relationship between Pemecutan Palace in Denpasar and Minang people, and the levels of validity of facts and sources. Data were taken from existing documents, interviews with Minang community leaders in Bali, and meetings held by the Minang community in Bali. The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) was used to analyze the data. Several interpretations can be stated. The cultural, survival, and ideological discourses inspired the Minang people come to Bali. These discourses have a collective memory status. A number of discourses with the level of cold facts, individual memories, and inferences are the first arrival of Minang people to Bali and the relationship between Pemecutan Palace and Minang people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it