MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988013307 · doi:10.1071/rd19144

Evidence that glycosaminoglycan storage and collagen deposition in the cauda epididymidis does not impair sperm viability in the Mucopolysaccharidosis type I mouse model

2019· article· en· W2988013307 on OpenAlexaff
Cinthia Castro do Nascimento, Odair Aguiar, Gustavo Monteiro Viana, Vânia D’Almeida

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpididymisLysosomal storage diseaseSpermGlycosaminoglycanMucopolysaccharidosis type IBiologyAndrologySperm motilityCell biologyMotilityChemistryEndocrinologyInternal medicineEnzyme replacement therapyAnatomyBiochemistryMedicineEnzymeDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is a lysosomal storage disease caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal hydrolase, α-L-iduronidase (IDUA). IDUA degrades heparan and dermatan sulfates, two types of glycosaminoglycan (GAG), important signalling and structural molecules of the extracellular matrix. Because many cell types store GAGs, MPS I has been investigated in human and animal models. Enzyme replacement therapy is available for MPS I patients and has improved their life expectancy, allowing them to achieve reproductive age. The aim of this study was to evaluate epididymal and sperm morphology and function in a murine model of MPS I. We used C57BL Idua+/+ and Idua-/- adult male mice (6 months old) to investigate epididymal morphology, sperm ultrastructure, GAG characterisation and mating competence. Epithelial GAG storage, especially in the cauda epididymidis, was seen in Idua-/- mice. Regardless of the morphologic change and GAG storage found in the cauda epididymis, sperm morphology and motility were normal, similar to wild types. In the interstitium, vacuolated cells were found in addition to deposits of GAGs. Mating was not impaired in Idua-/- males and litter sizes were similar between groups. At the time point of the disease evaluated, the deficiency in IDUA affected the morphology of the epididymis in male Idua-/- mice, whereas sperm appearance and motility and the male's capacity to mate and impregnate females were preserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207