MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988056839 · doi:10.1063/1.5125255

Near zero-bias MIIM diode based on TiO2/ZnO for energy harvesting applications

2019· article· en· W2988056839 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmed Y. Elsharabasy, Abdullah H. Alshehri, Mohamed H. Bakr, M. Jamal Deen, Kevin P. Musselman, Mustafa Yavuz

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsResponsivityMaterials scienceDiodeOptoelectronicsAtomic layer depositionDielectricInsulator (electricity)PhotolithographyLayer (electronics)NanotechnologyPhotodetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy harvesting rectennas require ultrafast rectifying diodes that are efficiently matched to the optical nanoantenna. These diodes should possess low on-resistance and high responsivity. Here, we introduce a metal-insulator-metal diode composed of a new material, Ti-TiO2-Al. This diode has a 1.0 nm ultrathin insulator layer fabricated using atomic layer deposition (ALD). It has a zero-bias resistance of 275 Ω and a maximum responsivity of 3.1 A/W. To further improve its performance, another ultrathin layer of ZnO was added. The proposed Ti-TiO2/ZnO-Al metal-insulator-insulator-metal diode has a zero-bias resistance of 312 Ω and a maximum responsivity of 5.1 A/W. The two types of diodes are fabricated on a SiO2 substrate using conventional photolithography and ALD. Between 20 °C and 55 °C, the I-V characteristics did not show much temperature dependence. The effective barrier height, dielectric constant, and electron effective mass in each insulator are extracted using a constrained and derivative-based optimization algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP AdvancesSame topicNanowire Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207