MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988132782 · doi:10.1109/tits.2019.2949227

A Unified Lateral Preview Driver Model for Road Vehicles

2019· article· en· W2988132782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVehicle dynamicsAdvanced driver assistance systemsEngineeringComputer scienceMode (computer interface)SimulationAutomotive engineeringControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Artificial intelligenceHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a unified lateral preview driver model for closed-loop dynamic simulations of road vehicles. Numerous driver models have been proposed for Single-Unit Vehicles (SUVs). Some SUV-based driver models have been applied to closed-loop simulations of Multi-Trailer Articulated Heavy Vehicles (MTAHVs). However, the dynamics of MTAHVs is significantly different from that of SUVs, and drivers of Multi-Unit Vehicles (MUVs) have different driving performance and skills. Very few driver models have been proposed for closed-loop simulations of MUVs. This paper designs the unified driver model, considering the dynamic features of both SUVs and MUVs. The driver model is derived using a sliding mode control (SMC) technique, and it distinguishes itself from conventional driver models with a number of features. Simulations demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed driver model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it