MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988132782 · doi:10.1109/tits.2019.2949227

A Unified Lateral Preview Driver Model for Road Vehicles

2019· article· en· W2988132782 on OpenAlexafffund
Shenjin Zhu, Yuping He

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVehicle dynamicsAdvanced driver assistance systemsEngineeringComputer scienceMode (computer interface)SimulationAutomotive engineeringControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Artificial intelligenceHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a unified lateral preview driver model for closed-loop dynamic simulations of road vehicles. Numerous driver models have been proposed for Single-Unit Vehicles (SUVs). Some SUV-based driver models have been applied to closed-loop simulations of Multi-Trailer Articulated Heavy Vehicles (MTAHVs). However, the dynamics of MTAHVs is significantly different from that of SUVs, and drivers of Multi-Unit Vehicles (MUVs) have different driving performance and skills. Very few driver models have been proposed for closed-loop simulations of MUVs. This paper designs the unified driver model, considering the dynamic features of both SUVs and MUVs. The driver model is derived using a sliding mode control (SMC) technique, and it distinguishes itself from conventional driver models with a number of features. Simulations demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed driver model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207