MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W298817980

No Longer "Apart"? Multiculturalism Policy and Canadian Literature

2001· article· en· W298817980 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Judy Young

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismCanadian literatureThe artsDiversity (politics)Political scienceCultural policyPublic policySociologyMainstreamGovernment (linguistics)Media studiesHumanitiesLawLiteratureArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT/RESUME Despite thirty years of official Multiculturalism in Canada, there is a dearth of research relating to state policies in support of, and public institutional responses to, cultural and racial diversity in the arts. This paper reviews developments in this field with particular reference to Canadian literature, which, like Canadian society, is characterized by a growing diversity. Some of the best-known Canadian writers are first-generation immigrants. Their work often reflects multiple perspectives and meanings, and their literary identity is hard to categorize. However, their presence in the Canadian literary canon is now undisputed. On the basis of a review of the federal government's support for the writing and publishing efforts of Canadian writers of various origins, this paper examines if and how these policies have influenced and helped shape the Canadian literary establishment in the last thirty years. It looks at the various measures taken to provide opportunities for writers and to encourage publishe rs, critics, teachers, and the public in general to accept their work as Canadian. It raises the question of what the mainstream is in Canadian writing today and points out the ambiguities and dilemmas inherent both in the policy and in the nature of the artistic/creative process. Apres 30 ans d'application du Multiculturalisme au Canada, la recherche en maitere de promotion de Ia diversite culturelle et raciale dans le domaine des arts que cc soit par cette politique ou d' autres politiques gouvernementales, comme Ia recherche sur le respect de cette diversite par les institutions publiques, demeurent plus que reduites. Cet article tente de resumer les developpements survenus dans ces deux champs, particulierement en litteature. La litterature canadienne a l'instar de Ia societe canadienne presente une diversite croissante et certains des ecrivains canadiens les plus connus sont des immigrants. Leur oeuvre presente souvent une complexite de points de vue et de significations qui rend difficile tout jugement sur leur identite litteaire, mais leur reconnaissance comme ecrivains canadiens est indiscutable et n'est pas discutee. Cet article s'appuie sur un bilan de l'aide apportee par le gouvernement fedeal Ia production et a Ia publication d'ecrivains canadiens de toutes origines. Il che rche clarifier si et comment les politiques publiques ont contribue Ia transformation du milieu litteaire canadien durant les trente dernieres annees. Pour ce faire, il examine les mesures adoptees en vue d'offrir des ouvertures aux ecrivains et d'encourager l'acceptation de leur oeuvre par les maisons d'edition, les critiques litteraires, les enseignants et le public en general. Il souleve la question de la definition de ce qui l'on denomme actuellement litterature canadienne et, ce faisant, il montre les ambiguites et les dilemmes de la politique du multiculturalisme, comme de la creation artistique. ********** original impetus for this paper (1) was provided by Professor Peter Li's 1994 article A World Apart: Multicultural World of Visible Minorities and the Art World in Canada. (2) In this article Li makes a causal connection between Multiculturalism funding and the marginalization of artists, especially visible minority artists. He claims that Canada's primarily Eurocentric public policy towards the arts has produced two different support structures and therefore two unequal worlds. The first is the formal legitimized and high-status art world of white Canadians, and the second a marginal folkloric and low-status multicultural circle reserved for recent immigrants of mainly non-white origin. (366) He further argues that the Multiculturalism policy was not going to alter existing institutions, transform the Canada Council or museums and galleries. program in supporting folkloric performances in national festivities ... funding for these activities persisted through the 80s and ear ly 90s despite shifting priorities . …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207