MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988217150 · doi:10.17118/11143/16181

Le lieu commun revisité dans Là où était ici d’Hélène Monette

2019· article· fr· W2988217150 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nicole Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers Anne Hébert · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En relisant la poésie de Monette, on se rend compte de l’omniprésence du lieu commun,
\net en particulier dans le recueil "Là où était ici" (2011), qui fera l’objet de cette étude : expressions
\nfigées, proverbes, maximes, mais aussi images-motifs, jeux de mots qui tournent mal.
\nMonette saborde le lieu commun, lui insufflant de ce fait une seconde vie, qui refuse de se plier
\nau pronostic de la forme figée. Le lieu commun détourné reproduit dans la forme ce que Monette
\ndonne à voir sur le fond : un travail de sape, mais pas de destruction, car si l’édifice de nos
\ncroyances est ébranlé dans ses fondations, il tiendra après le passage des bourrasques que lui
\nfera subir l’auteure, fissurant le ciment de l’idéologie séculaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers Anne HébertSame topicFrench Literature and Critical TheoryFrench-language works237,207