MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

3D inversion of electromagnetic logging-while-drilling data

2019· article· en· W2988282179 on OpenAlexaff
David Marchant, Nigel Clegg, Luke Rawsthorne, Jari Kunnas

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsGeoscience BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogging while drillingInversion (geology)LoggingComputer scienceDrillingTransmitterDecoupling (probability)GeologyMeasurement while drillingWell loggingPetroleum engineeringSeismologyMechanical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryElectromagnetic logging while drilling is commonly used to infer information about the electrical properties around the wellbore and to aid in geosteering. Data from modern tools, which combine multiple transmitter and receiver orientations and offsets, can be difficult to manually interpret in all but the simplest of environments. Inversion is required to optimally extract and use the information from this data. Although low dimensional inversions can provide useful information in certain environments, full, 3D solutions are required to extract the maximum possible amount of information from the data.In this work, we present the first fully 3D inversion of electromagnetic logging-while-drilling data. Moreover, we demonstrate that using semi-structured meshing and mesh decoupling, along with advanced data integration techniques, enables the inversions to be performed in real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207