The Geosciences DeVL Experiment: new information generated from old magnetotelluric data of The University of Adelaide on the NCI High Performance Computing Platform
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SummaryIn recent years, magnetotelluric (MT) processing has become computationally intensive as the scale and size of MT surveys being run increases. Consequently, High Performance Computing (HPC) is now becoming a valuable tool for timely processing and modelling of these large MT datasets. As part of the MT component of the 2017-2019 Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) funded Geoscience Data Enhanced Virtual Laboratory (DeVL) continuity project, The National Computational Infrastructure (NCI) at the Australian National University will enable MT datasets from The University of Adelaide to be added to the NCI HPC platform with the goal of creating a more Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) and open public resource. A focus will be on making the time series datasets more suitable for use on HPC and more interoperable with other Earth science disciplines, where High Performance Data (HPD) formats will allow for better scalability and performance. Metadata attributes, as defined by the Australian MT research community, will be added directly to the time series data files. Additionally, time series processing and 3D inversion codes are being optimised for HPD/HPC, with the end goal of rapid time series processing and 3D inversion. Making FAIR MT time series available on HPC can lead to a transformative change in the way MT data analysis is routinely conducted and such a change has the capacity to create new ways of doing collaborative and transparent MT analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it