MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988400892 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23679

Determination of kinetic parameters of homogenous continuous flow esterification of monobutyl chlorophosphate in a microreactor

2019· article· en· W2988400892 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuqiang Zhang, Jun Li, Jin Yang, Ming Chen, Yubin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMicromixerMicroreactorKineticsMixing (physics)ThermodynamicsButanolActivation energyMaterials scienceChemistryChemical engineeringCatalysisPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryEthanolPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Synthesized by phosphorus oxychloride and n‐butanol, tri‐n‐butyl phosphate from a three‐step esterification reaction has an extensive range of applications in industrial processes. Similarly, monobutyl chlorophosphate can be obtained rapidly by mixing n‐butanol and phosphorus oxychloride. In view of this, we investigated the kinetics of esterification of monobutyl chlorophosphate with a microchannel system composed of micromixer and coiled capillaries. The reaction started from mixing the phosphorus oxychloride solution and n‐butanol solution in a micromixer, with temperature and residence time in a delayed loop controlled, and then quenching the solution in a container with magnetic agitation. The rate constants for the esterification reaction of monobutyl chlorophosphate were determined to be within a temperature range of 298‐318 K. It was found that the reaction kinetics is second order with respect to monobutyl chlorophosphate concentration and first order to n‐butanol concentration. In our research, a kinetic model was established, the values of the pre‐exponential factor and the activation energy of the reaction were obtained. The reaction kinetic model can interpret the synthesis mechanism of phosphate esters well, thus playing a guiding role in process intensification of phosphate esters synthesis in the future. Additionally, our model is also valuable because it contributes to the establishment of a reaction kinetics network model for the cascade reaction to synthesize phosphate esters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationFrench-language works237,207