MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988475883 · doi:10.1130/abs/2019am-340124

BEREA SANDSTONE: A HERITAGE STONE QUARRIED FOR MORE THAN 200 YEARS IN OHIO, USA

2019· article· en· W2988475883 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph T. Hannibal

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of America · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArchaeologyMining engineeringHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Berea sandstone, quarried for more than 200 years in Ohio, has historically been one of the most widely used sandstones in North America. Early on, its use was international, as the stone was used as dimension stone in both the United States and Canada. A number of important buildings have been built with it, including the Michigan State Capital and Pittsburgh's Carnegie Building, as well as parts of Parliament buildings in Canada. Many buildings constructed with Berea sandstone are now included in the U.S. National Register of Historic Places or the Canadian Register of Historic Places. Grindstones made of the sandstone were shipped throughout North America, as well as to South America, Europe, and Asia. The stone was used for other products as well, including millstones, sidewalks, and curbstones. Berea sandstone is also one of the most studied stones in the world by geologists and others as it has become a standard for sandstone analysis. Berea sandstone is celebrated at a number of Ohio locations, notably the northern Ohio localities of Berea in Cuyahoga County and the Amherst area in Lorain County, which have been the most important historic sources of this stone. Many older Berea quarries in Ohio are now located in parks and there is a growing body of literature noting this stone in the popular literature. Berea sandstone has been known by a number of different geological and commercial names such as Berea grit, Amherst stone, and Berea Sandstone (the lattermost a formal rock-unit name). This complicates its identification using historic sources. The stone quarried in the major northern Ohio quarries, as well as many other quarries, however, is quite homogeneous, so can be identified by its grain size and other factors. For the above reasons, this stone would make a good candidate as a formal Global Heritage Stone Resource, joining the few other North American sandstones formally recognized (Jacobsville Sandstone) or recommended (Seneca sandstone) as Global Heritage Stone Resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of AmericaSame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207