MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988489964 · doi:10.29173/ikc3301

Tuffisitic kimberlites: mineralogical characteristics relevant to their formation

2019· article· en· W2988489964 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Kimberlite Conference Extended Abstracts: 2008 · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKimberliteGeologyGeochemistryEarth scienceMantle (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tuffisitic kimberlites (TK) are the dominant components of many kimberlite pipes in southern Africa. These rocks are distinct from all other textural varieties of kimberlite. The objective of this study is to investigate the optically intractable features of TK using back-scattered electron (BSE) petrography and quantitative compositional data. The study involves TKs from the Wesselton Mine, a type area pipe in Kimberley, South Africa. Wesselton was selected because: it has been mined since 1890, it is a type locality for fresh archetypal holocrystalline coherent kimberlite (13-33 modal % olivine macrocrysts, 16-26 modal % olivine phenocrysts, 4 -16 modal % monticellite, up to 13 modal % groundmass phlogopite, up to 16 modal % carbonate, serpentine, spinel, perovskite, apatite, but no clinopyroxene; and detailed investigations have shown that the pipe includes at least ten phases of kimberlite ranging from typical hypabyssal kimberlite (HK) to volumetrically significant TK to depths of >930 m as well as HK to TK transitional textures (Fig.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it