The official discourse of the Moroccan authorities and their allies in the greening of their public policies: modernisation of authoritarianism, international insertion and the fight against climate change
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is one that is largely characterized by authoritarianregimes. Much traditional scholarship writes many of these regimes off as anti democratic, and hencenegate the possibility to work meaningfully and effectively with these regimes toward important globalgoals. By engaging in a post-democratic approach this paper looks beyond what Morocco is lacking inthe way of democratic principles and norms and instead focuses on the beneficial action it is taking tofight climate change domestically, and ultimately work with the international community to contributeto global climate goals. This paper explores the many initiatives the Moroccan regime is undertaking atits own behest, while exploring the key actors in these activities as well as the main impetus for doingso. Ultimately it builds data toward conclusions that although the Moroccan regime is doing this is largepart to further solidify and legitimize its own power, it is simultaneously taking important actions thatare beneficial to its own people as well as the rest of the world. In this sense the authoritarian Moroccanregime is combating climate change, as a means to maintain and bolster its own grip on power in theregion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it